Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk (PIER)


Zantedeschia aethiopica


RISK ASSESSMENT RESULTS: Reject, Score: 13

Note:  Risk assessment prepared for Australia

Information on Risk Assessments


        Zantedeschia aethiopica
A. Biogeography/     arum lily
  historical   Commelinaceae P&C
1 Domestication/ 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? Y
  cultivation 1.02 Has the species become naturalised where grown? Y
    1.03 Does the species have weedy races? N
2 Climate and 2.01 Species suited to Australian climates (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) 2
  Distribution 2.02 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) 2
    2.03 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) N
    2.04 Native or naturalised in regions with extended dry periods N
    2.05 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? Y
3 Weed 3.01 Naturalised beyond native range Y
  Elsewhere 3.02 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed Y
  (interacts with 2.01 3.03 Weed of agriculture N
  to give a weighted 3.04 Environmental weed Y
  score) 3.05 Congeneric weed N
B. Biology/Ecology    
4 Undesirable 4.01 Produces spines, thorns or burrs N
  traits 4.02 Allelopathic N
    4.03 Parasitic N
    4.04 Unpalatable to grazing animals N
    4.05 Toxic to animals Y
    4.06 Host for recognised pests and pathogens N
    4.07 Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans Y
    4.08 Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems N
    4.09 Is a shade tolerant plant at some stage of its life cycle Y
    4.10 Grows on infertile soils Y
    4.11 Climbing or smothering growth habit N
    4.12 Forms dense thickets N
5 Plant 5.01 Aquatic N
  type 5.02 Grass  
    5.03 Nitrogen fixing woody plant  
    5.04 Geophyte  
6 Reproduction 6.01 Evidence of substantial reproductive failure in native habitat N
    6.02 Produces viable seed. Y
    6.03 Hybridises naturally  
    6.04 Self-compatible or apomictic  
    6.05 Requires specialist pollinators Y
    6.06 Reproduction by vegetative fragmentation Y
    6.07 Minimum generative time (years) 3
7 Dispersal mechanisms 7.01 Propagules likely to be dispersed unintentionally (plants growing in areas with much vehicle movement) Y
    7.02 Propagules dispersed intentionally by people Y
    7.03 Propagules likely to disperse as a produce contaminant  
    7.04 Propagules adapted to wind dispersal  
    7.05 Propagules water dispersed Y
    7.06 Propagules bird dispersed Y
    7.07 Propagules dispersed by other animals (externally)  
    7.08 Propagules survive passage through the gut  
8 Persistence 8.01 Prolific seed production (>2000/m2) Y
  attributes 8.02 Evidence that a persistent propagule bank is formed (>1 yr) N
    8.03 Well controlled by herbicides N
    8.04 Tolerates, or benefits from, mutilation or cultivation  
    8.05 Effective natural enemies present in Australia Y
      Outcome: Reject
      Score: 13
  Statistical summary   Biogeography 5
  of scoring   Score partition:                       Undesirable attributes 3
      Biology/ecology 5
      Biogeography 10
      Questions answered:                       Undesirable attributes 12
      Biology/ecology 14
      Total 36
      Agricultural 2
      Sector affected:                                   Environmental 8
      Nusiance 3
   A= agricultural, E = environmental, N = nuisance, C=combined  

Risk assessment prepared by Rod Randall


Need more info? Have questions? Comments? Information to contribute? Contact PIER!


[ Return to PIER homepage ]


This page new 26 January 2001.