Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk (PIER)
RISK ASSESSMENT RESULTS: Low risk, score: 3 (low risk based on second screen)
|
Australian/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Hawai‘i. Research directed by C. Daehler (UH Botany) with funding from the Kaulunani Urban Forestry Program and US Forest Service Information on
Risk Assessments |
Eucalyptus robusta; swamp mahogany |
Answer |
||
1.01 |
Is the species highly domesticated? |
y=-3, n=0 |
n |
1.02 |
Has the species become naturalized where grown? |
y=-1, n=-1 |
n |
1.03 |
Does the species have weedy races? |
y=-1, n=-1 |
n |
2.01 |
Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) – If island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute “wet tropical” for “tropical or subtropical” |
See Append 2 |
2 |
2.02 |
Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) see appendix 2 |
1 |
|
2.03 |
Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
2.04 |
Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or subtropical climates |
y=1, n=0 |
y |
2.05 |
Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y=-2 |
?=-1, n=0 |
y |
3.01 |
Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Append 2), n= question 2.05 |
n |
|
3.02 |
Garden/amenity/disturbance weed y = 1*multiplier (see Append 2) |
n=0 |
n |
3.03 |
Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed y = 2*multiplier (see Append 2) |
n=0 |
n |
3.04 |
Environmental weed y = 2*multiplier (see Append 2) |
n=0 |
n |
3.05 |
Congeneric weed y = 1*multiplier (see Append 2) |
n=0 |
y |
4.01 |
Produces spines, thorns or burrs |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.02 |
Allelopathic |
y=1, n=0 |
|
4.03 |
Parasitic |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.04 |
Unpalatable to grazing animals |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
4.05 |
Toxic to animals |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.06 |
Host for recognized pests and pathogens |
y=1, n=0 |
y |
4.07 |
Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.08 |
Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.09 |
Is a shade tolerant plant at some stage of its life cycle |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.1 |
Tolerates a wide range of soil conditions (or limestone conditions if not a volcanic island) |
y=1, n=0 |
y |
4.11 |
Climbing or smothering growth habit |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.12 |
Forms dense thickets |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
5.01 |
Aquatic |
y=5, n=0 |
n |
5.02 |
Grass |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
5.03 |
Nitrogen fixing woody plant |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
5.04 |
Geophyte (herbaceous with underground storage organs -- bulbs, corms, or tubers) |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
6.01 |
Evidence of substantial reproductive failure in native habitat |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
6.02 |
Produces viable seed. |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
6.03 |
Hybridizes naturally |
y=1, n=-1 |
|
6.04 |
Self-compatible or apomictic |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
6.05 |
Requires specialist pollinators |
y=-1, n=0 |
n |
6.06 |
Reproduction by vegetative fragmentation |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
6.07 |
Minimum generative time (years) 1 year = 1, 2 or 3 years = 0, 4+ years = -1 |
See left |
3 |
7.01 |
Propagules likely to be dispersed unintentionally (plants growing in heavily trafficked areas) |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
7.02 |
Propagules dispersed intentionally by people |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
7.03 |
Propagules likely to disperse as a produce contaminant |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
7.04 |
Propagules adapted to wind dispersal |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
7.05 |
Propagules water dispersed |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
7.06 |
Propagules bird dispersed |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
7.07 |
Propagules dispersed by other animals (externally) |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
7.08 |
Propagules survive passage through the gut |
y=1, n=-1 |
|
8.01 |
Prolific seed production (>1000/m2) |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
8.02 |
Evidence that a persistent propagule bank is formed (>1 yr) |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
8.03 |
Well controlled by herbicides |
y=-1, n=1 |
|
8.04 |
Tolerates, or benefits from, mutilation, cultivation, or fire |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
8.05 |
Effective natural enemies present locally (e.g. introduced biocontrol agents) |
y=-1, n=1 |
|
Total score: |
3 |
Supporting data:
Source |
Notes |
|
1.01 |
no evidence |
|
1.02 |
Wagner et al. Flowering plants of Hawaii |
"regenerating from seeds near plantings" |
1.03 |
||
2.01 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
E. robusta occurs naturally in Australia, within a narrow
coastal strip from southern New South Wales (near Nowra) to coastal
south-eastern Queensland (north-west of Bundaberg). It is also grows on the
offshore islands of North Stradbroke, Moreton and Fraser in south-east
Queensland. A disjunct population occurs just north of Yeppoon in coastal,
central Queensland. |
2.02 |
||
2.03 |
(1)CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. (2)http://pppis.fao.org/ |
(1)E. robusta occurs mainly in open-forest, where it is
restricted to swamps, edges of saltwater estuaries and lagoons, or rarely on
the lower slopes of valleys (Fenton et al., 1977; Boland et al., 1984). |
2.04 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
Climate |
2.05 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
Location of introductions |
3.01 |
Wagner et al. Flowering plants of Hawaii |
"regenerating from seeds near plantings" |
3.02 |
no evidence |
|
3.03 |
no evidence |
|
3.04 |
Weeds Gone Wild: Alien Plant Invaders of Natural Areas. |
E. robusta was on the plant list. [No evidence: this list is notorious for it's incacurate information -- list is assembled from unreviewed input anyone] |
3.05 |
Bacon, P. (Project coordinator) (1997) An electronic atlas of weeds and invasive species.Version 1.0 May 1997. (Based on the original work "Holm, L.; J.V. Puncho; J.P. Herberger & D.L. Plucknett (1979) A Geographical Atlas of World Weeds. John Wiley & Sons, Inc." ) |
E. campageana, E. ferruginea, E. gracilis, E. marginata, E. miniata, e. pilularis, E. populnea, and E. tetradonta were listed as principal weeds in Australia (native habitat) |
4.01 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
no description of these traits |
4.02 |
Chou, C.-H. (1980) Allelopathic researches in the subtropical vegetation in Taiwan. Comparative Physiology and Ecology, 1980, Vol.5, No.4, pp.222-234, many ref. |
AB: "The species that exhibited allelopathy or allelopathic-like patterns included Acacia confusa, Bauhinia purpurea, Eucalyptus robusta, Glochidion fortueni, Phyllostachys spp." [don't know about field situations] |
4.03 |
no evidence |
|
4.04 |
USDA, NRCS. 2001. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.1 (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. |
Plant characteristics\ Palatable Browse Animal: Low |
4.05 |
no evidence |
|
4.06 |
Barnard, E. L. (1984) Occurrence, impact, and fungicidal control of girdling stem cankers caused by Cylindrocladium scoparium on eucalyptus seedlings in a south Florida nursery. Plant Disease, 1984, Vol.68, No.6, pp.471-473, 15 ref. |
AB: "C. scoparium caused extensive losses of Eucalyptus grandis and E. robusta seedlings by inducing girdling cankers on the lower stems." |
4.07 |
no evidence |
|
4.08 |
no evidence |
|
4.09 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
":As with other species in the genus, E. robusta is intolerant of shade " |
4.1 |
(1)CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. (2)http://www.australiaplants.com/Eucalyptus_robusta.htm |
(1)E. robusta is highly tolerant to seasonal waterlogging.
It occurs mainly on margins of swamps, and on the fringes of salt water
estuaries or lagoons. Soils are typically heavy clays, but also light sandy
clays (Marcar et al., 1995). On the offshore islands of south-east
Queensland, such as Fraser Island, it is found on almost pure sands (Boland
et al., 1984). |
4.11 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
"E. robusta is a medium to large tree with a dense crown and long, spreading branches when open grown. It regularly attains heights of 20-30 m, with a d.b.h. of up to 1 m (Boland DJ, Brooker MIH, Chippendale GM, Hall N, Hyland BPM, Johnston RD, Kleinig DA, Turner JD, 1984. Forest trees of Australia. 4th ed. Melbourne:Thomas Nelson and CSIRO. xvi + 687 pp.; 77 ref.)." |
4.12 |
no evidence |
|
5.01 |
terrestrial |
|
5.02 |
tree; Myrtaceae |
|
5.03 |
no evidence |
|
5.04 |
tree |
|
6.01 |
no evidence |
|
6.02 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
"Seed is the main means of propagating E. robusta." |
6.03 |
no evidence |
|
6.04 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
"They reproduce by a mixed mating system, with both outcrossing and selfcrossing (Moran GF, 1992. Patterns of genetic diversity in Australian tree species. New Forests, 6:49-66.)." |
6.05 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
"Eucalypts have hermaphrodite, protandrous flowers and are primarily pollinated by insects and birds (Griffin AR, 1989. Strategies for the genetic improvement of yield in Eucalyptus. In: Pereira JS, Landsberg JJ, eds. Biomass production by fast-growing trees. Dordrecht, Germany: Kluwer, 247-265.). " |
6.06 |
no evidence |
|
6.07 |
(1)CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. (2)http://newcrop.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/duke_energy/Eucalyptus_robusta.html |
(1) It has been reported to flower after 2 years in Kenya (Jacobs MR, 1981. Eucalypts for planting. Ed. 2. Forestry Series No. 11. Rome: FAO xxiv + 677 pp. + 36 pl.), and after 5 years in California (King JP, Krugman SL, 1980. Tests of 36 Eucalyptus species in northern California. Research-Paper,-Pacific-Southwest-Forest-and-Range-Experiment-Station,-USDA-Forest-Service. 1980, No. PSW-152, ii + 6 pp.; 1 pl.; 5 ref.). (2)In Malaysia, it starts fruiting as early as year 4. Fruits take two years to ripen in China. Fruits are collected when the capsules start to turn black. |
7.01 |
no evidence |
|
7.02 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
Location of introductions |
7.03 |
no evidence |
|
7.04 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
here is an average of 452,000 viable seed per kilogram of seed and chaff mix (Turnbull JW, Doran JC, 1987. Seed development and germination in the Myrtaceae. In: Langkamp PJ, ed. Germination of Australian native plant seed, 46-57, 186-198; 57 ref.) [very small seeds] |
7.05 |
no evidence |
|
7.06 |
no evidence |
|
7.07 |
no evidence |
|
7.08 |
no evidence of ingestion |
|
8.01 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
There is an average of 452,000 viable seed per kilogram of seed and chaff mix (Turnbull and Doran, 1987). Seedlots may be cleaned to a high level of purity by sieving. In order to separate the seed from the chaff a 12.6 /cm?mesh is required (Boland et al., 1980). [very small seeds] |
8.02 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
"No pre-sowing treatment is required. Rapid and complete germination is achieved under moist, warm conditions in the presence of light (25C is optimal in the laboratory)" |
8.03 |
no evidence |
|
8.04 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
"This species recovers well after fire" |
8.05 |
no evidence |
Need more info? Have questions? Comments? Information to contribute? Contact PIER!
[ Return to PIER homepage ] [Risk assessment page]
This page updated 30 September 2005